rabbit anti-rat cd3 Search Results


94
Miltenyi Biotec anti cd3
Anti Cd3, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/CD3+Antibody%2C+anti-rat%2C+REAfinity/pm31649144-192-30-32
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

85
Aviva Systems cd3
Cd3, supplied by Aviva Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 85/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/RAT+ANTI+HUMAN+CD3+Antibody/10__1097_slash_nen__0000000000000005-54-122-127
Average 85 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
85/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio-Rad monoclonal rat anti mouse cd3
Monoclonal Rat Anti Mouse Cd3, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/Rat+anti+Mouse+CD3/pmc05792059-80-51-47
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
monoclonal rat anti mouse cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Bio-Rad rat anti cd3
Confocal microscopy was conducted on tissue sections ChAT-GFP (C57BL/6 background) mice for T-cells <t>(anti-CD3),</t> ChAT (anti-GFP), and sympathetic axons (anti-TH). The section was identified and overlapping tiles were acquired from 943 µm x 454 µm area of MLN (upper panel, scale bar =100 µm). Areas indicated in the bounding boxes are shown in the middle <t>(CD3,</t> ChAT-GFP, TH) and lower panels (ChAT-GFP, TH, scale bar = 20 μm). Region of the hilus in the MLN is within box “i”. Representative images obtained from 8 mice.
Rat Anti Cd3, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/Rat+anti+Human+CD3/pmc06800652-97-24-28
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Bio-Rad cd3 fitc rat igg1 cd3
Confocal microscopy was conducted on tissue sections ChAT-GFP (C57BL/6 background) mice for T-cells <t>(anti-CD3),</t> ChAT (anti-GFP), and sympathetic axons (anti-TH). The section was identified and overlapping tiles were acquired from 943 µm x 454 µm area of MLN (upper panel, scale bar =100 µm). Areas indicated in the bounding boxes are shown in the middle <t>(CD3,</t> ChAT-GFP, TH) and lower panels (ChAT-GFP, TH, scale bar = 20 μm). Region of the hilus in the MLN is within box “i”. Representative images obtained from 8 mice.
Cd3 Fitc Rat Igg1 Cd3, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/Mouse+anti+Rat+CD3/pmc06597077__pone__0218949__s002-0-19-25
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cd3 fitc rat igg1 cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rat anti human cd3ε mab
Gain-of-function mutations in β TMR (A) <t>CD3</t> surface expression of 1G4-WT and mutants. x̄ ± SD of CD3 + cells, n = 3–8. Ala (red) and Leu (blue) substitution. (B) pErk response of 1G4-WT and β mutants stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . x̄ ± SEM of pErk + cells; n = 3–6; unpaired t test, p = 0.0011 (βA290), p = 0.0092 (βA291). (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT and 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.82 (WT), 0.89 (βA291); EC 50 = 19.5 ± 5.5 (WT), 19.0 ± 3.1 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 E. (D) (6V-A2) 4 binding to 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top, (6V-A2) 4 dose-dependent association, n = 3, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.97 (βA291), F-test (ns). Bottom, (6V-A2) 4 dissociation rate, n = 5, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.84 (WT), 0.72 (βA291), F-test (ns). (E) pζ response of J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 MFI versus pζ MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.95 (WT), 0.96 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pζ, n = 4, unpaired t test p = 0.0078. See also Figure S1 F. (F) Basal pζ in J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. pζ MFI normalized to surface CD3 MFI, n = 8, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also H and S1I. (G) FRAP of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. x̄ ± SD of diffusion coefficient, D (μm 2 /s), n ≥ 20 cells, t test (ns). (H) Lateral distribution by dSTORM of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. Plots represent pair auto-correlation analysis (g), x̄ ± SD of ≥ 25 cells. Histograms show DBSCAN cluster analysis, x̄ ± SD of cluster size per cell, t test (ns). " width="250" height="auto" />
Rat Anti Human Cd3ε Mab, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/CD3epsilon+(CD3-12)+Rat+mAb/pmc08293630-16-0-5
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti human cd3ε mab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Bio-Rad night wako mouse cd3 molecular complex 17a2 rat igg2b
Gain-of-function mutations in β TMR (A) <t>CD3</t> surface expression of 1G4-WT and mutants. x̄ ± SD of CD3 + cells, n = 3–8. Ala (red) and Leu (blue) substitution. (B) pErk response of 1G4-WT and β mutants stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . x̄ ± SEM of pErk + cells; n = 3–6; unpaired t test, p = 0.0011 (βA290), p = 0.0092 (βA291). (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT and 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.82 (WT), 0.89 (βA291); EC 50 = 19.5 ± 5.5 (WT), 19.0 ± 3.1 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 E. (D) (6V-A2) 4 binding to 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top, (6V-A2) 4 dose-dependent association, n = 3, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.97 (βA291), F-test (ns). Bottom, (6V-A2) 4 dissociation rate, n = 5, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.84 (WT), 0.72 (βA291), F-test (ns). (E) pζ response of J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 MFI versus pζ MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.95 (WT), 0.96 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pζ, n = 4, unpaired t test p = 0.0078. See also Figure S1 F. (F) Basal pζ in J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. pζ MFI normalized to surface CD3 MFI, n = 8, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also H and S1I. (G) FRAP of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. x̄ ± SD of diffusion coefficient, D (μm 2 /s), n ≥ 20 cells, t test (ns). (H) Lateral distribution by dSTORM of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. Plots represent pair auto-correlation analysis (g), x̄ ± SD of ≥ 25 cells. Histograms show DBSCAN cluster analysis, x̄ ± SD of cluster size per cell, t test (ns). " width="250" height="auto" />
Night Wako Mouse Cd3 Molecular Complex 17a2 Rat Igg2b, supplied by Bio-Rad, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/Rat+anti+Mouse+IgG2b/pmc08180177__12974_2021_2176_MOESM1_ESM-33-44-68
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
night wako mouse cd3 molecular complex 17a2 rat igg2b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit monoclonal antibody anti cd3
Gain-of-function mutations in β TMR (A) <t>CD3</t> surface expression of 1G4-WT and mutants. x̄ ± SD of CD3 + cells, n = 3–8. Ala (red) and Leu (blue) substitution. (B) pErk response of 1G4-WT and β mutants stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . x̄ ± SEM of pErk + cells; n = 3–6; unpaired t test, p = 0.0011 (βA290), p = 0.0092 (βA291). (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT and 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.82 (WT), 0.89 (βA291); EC 50 = 19.5 ± 5.5 (WT), 19.0 ± 3.1 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 E. (D) (6V-A2) 4 binding to 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top, (6V-A2) 4 dose-dependent association, n = 3, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.97 (βA291), F-test (ns). Bottom, (6V-A2) 4 dissociation rate, n = 5, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.84 (WT), 0.72 (βA291), F-test (ns). (E) pζ response of J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 MFI versus pζ MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.95 (WT), 0.96 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pζ, n = 4, unpaired t test p = 0.0078. See also Figure S1 F. (F) Basal pζ in J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. pζ MFI normalized to surface CD3 MFI, n = 8, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also H and S1I. (G) FRAP of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. x̄ ± SD of diffusion coefficient, D (μm 2 /s), n ≥ 20 cells, t test (ns). (H) Lateral distribution by dSTORM of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. Plots represent pair auto-correlation analysis (g), x̄ ± SD of ≥ 25 cells. Histograms show DBSCAN cluster analysis, x̄ ± SD of cluster size per cell, t test (ns). " width="250" height="auto" />
Rabbit Monoclonal Antibody Anti Cd3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/CD3+Rat+mAb/pmc12490235-29-0-5
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit monoclonal antibody anti cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti cd3
Gain-of-function mutations in β TMR (A) <t>CD3</t> surface expression of 1G4-WT and mutants. x̄ ± SD of CD3 + cells, n = 3–8. Ala (red) and Leu (blue) substitution. (B) pErk response of 1G4-WT and β mutants stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . x̄ ± SEM of pErk + cells; n = 3–6; unpaired t test, p = 0.0011 (βA290), p = 0.0092 (βA291). (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT and 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.82 (WT), 0.89 (βA291); EC 50 = 19.5 ± 5.5 (WT), 19.0 ± 3.1 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 E. (D) (6V-A2) 4 binding to 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top, (6V-A2) 4 dose-dependent association, n = 3, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.97 (βA291), F-test (ns). Bottom, (6V-A2) 4 dissociation rate, n = 5, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.84 (WT), 0.72 (βA291), F-test (ns). (E) pζ response of J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 MFI versus pζ MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.95 (WT), 0.96 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pζ, n = 4, unpaired t test p = 0.0078. See also Figure S1 F. (F) Basal pζ in J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. pζ MFI normalized to surface CD3 MFI, n = 8, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also H and S1I. (G) FRAP of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. x̄ ± SD of diffusion coefficient, D (μm 2 /s), n ≥ 20 cells, t test (ns). (H) Lateral distribution by dSTORM of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. Plots represent pair auto-correlation analysis (g), x̄ ± SD of ≥ 25 cells. Histograms show DBSCAN cluster analysis, x̄ ± SD of cluster size per cell, t test (ns). " width="250" height="auto" />
Rabbit Anti Cd3, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/CD3+Rat+mAb/pmc10393516-77-47-51
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
SouthernBiotech rat anti mouse cd3
Three mm full thickness excisional wounds were made on dorsal skin of IL-4 Tg and WT mice. At various time points, frozen sections were prepared for neutrophil (Gr-1), macrophage (CD68), <t>CD3,</t> and DETC staining. Positively stained cells in the wounds and wound margins were counted and the average number per 20x field was calculated. a and b) Time course of the number of neutrophils and macrophages, respectively. c and d) YM1 and Arg1 mRNA expression in wounds respectively. e and f) Time course of the number of dermal <t>CD3+</t> lymphocytes and DETC, respectively. * p<0.05, # p<0.01, and ** p<0.001compared to WT at the same time point, respectively. NS: normal or unwounded skin. The number of mice used at each time point was 5.
Rat Anti Mouse Cd3, supplied by SouthernBiotech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/Rat+Anti-Mouse+IgD-Pacific+Blue/pmc04709197-51-28-37
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti mouse cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
R&D Systems anti cd3
Three mm full thickness excisional wounds were made on dorsal skin of IL-4 Tg and WT mice. At various time points, frozen sections were prepared for neutrophil (Gr-1), macrophage (CD68), <t>CD3,</t> and DETC staining. Positively stained cells in the wounds and wound margins were counted and the average number per 20x field was calculated. a and b) Time course of the number of neutrophils and macrophages, respectively. c and d) YM1 and Arg1 mRNA expression in wounds respectively. e and f) Time course of the number of dermal <t>CD3+</t> lymphocytes and DETC, respectively. * p<0.05, # p<0.01, and ** p<0.001compared to WT at the same time point, respectively. NS: normal or unwounded skin. The number of mice used at each time point was 5.
Anti Cd3, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/Mouse+CD3+Antibody/pmc05988763-121-21-29
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti cd3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Santa Cruz Biotechnology rat anti cd3 antibodies
Deficiency of sEH reduces the leukocyte infiltration and cytokine production. ((a) and (b)) 14 days after UUO surgery, kidneys were harvested. Kidney lysates from WT and sEH −/− mice were immunoblotted with F4/80, <t>CD3,</t> MPO, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and GAPDH. (c) The levels of MCP-1, MIP-2, IL-1 β , and IL-6 in kidneys were assessed by ELISA kits. Data are mean ± SEM from 8 mice. * P < 0.05 versus WT nonobstructed kidney; # P < 0.05 versus WT UUO kidney.
Rat Anti Cd3 Antibodies, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti-rat+cd3/CD3+Antibody/pmc04320902-33-11-16
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rat anti cd3 antibodies - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Confocal microscopy was conducted on tissue sections ChAT-GFP (C57BL/6 background) mice for T-cells (anti-CD3), ChAT (anti-GFP), and sympathetic axons (anti-TH). The section was identified and overlapping tiles were acquired from 943 µm x 454 µm area of MLN (upper panel, scale bar =100 µm). Areas indicated in the bounding boxes are shown in the middle (CD3, ChAT-GFP, TH) and lower panels (ChAT-GFP, TH, scale bar = 20 μm). Region of the hilus in the MLN is within box “i”. Representative images obtained from 8 mice.

Journal: Brain, behavior, and immunity

Article Title: Functional circuitry of neuro-immune communication in the mesenteric lymph node and spleen.

doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2019.08.188

Figure Lengend Snippet: Confocal microscopy was conducted on tissue sections ChAT-GFP (C57BL/6 background) mice for T-cells (anti-CD3), ChAT (anti-GFP), and sympathetic axons (anti-TH). The section was identified and overlapping tiles were acquired from 943 µm x 454 µm area of MLN (upper panel, scale bar =100 µm). Areas indicated in the bounding boxes are shown in the middle (CD3, ChAT-GFP, TH) and lower panels (ChAT-GFP, TH, scale bar = 20 μm). Region of the hilus in the MLN is within box “i”. Representative images obtained from 8 mice.

Article Snippet: Primary antibodies used in this study were rabbit Anti-TH (Millipore, AB152, Billerica, MA), goat anti-GFP (Rockland Immunochemicals, Limerick, PA), rabbit anti-TNF (Abeam, AB6671) and rat anti-CD3 (clone CD3-12, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA).

Techniques: Confocal Microscopy

Gain-of-function mutations in β TMR (A) CD3 surface expression of 1G4-WT and mutants. x̄ ± SD of CD3 + cells, n = 3–8. Ala (red) and Leu (blue) substitution. (B) pErk response of 1G4-WT and β mutants stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . x̄ ± SEM of pErk + cells; n = 3–6; unpaired t test, p = 0.0011 (βA290), p = 0.0092 (βA291). (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT and 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.82 (WT), 0.89 (βA291); EC 50 = 19.5 ± 5.5 (WT), 19.0 ± 3.1 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S1 E. (D) (6V-A2) 4 binding to 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top, (6V-A2) 4 dose-dependent association, n = 3, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.97 (βA291), F-test (ns). Bottom, (6V-A2) 4 dissociation rate, n = 5, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.84 (WT), 0.72 (βA291), F-test (ns). (E) pζ response of J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 MFI versus pζ MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.95 (WT), 0.96 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pζ, n = 4, unpaired t test p = 0.0078. See also Figure S1 F. (F) Basal pζ in J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. pζ MFI normalized to surface CD3 MFI, n = 8, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also H and S1I. (G) FRAP of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. x̄ ± SD of diffusion coefficient, D (μm 2 /s), n ≥ 20 cells, t test (ns). (H) Lateral distribution by dSTORM of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. Plots represent pair auto-correlation analysis (g), x̄ ± SD of ≥ 25 cells. Histograms show DBSCAN cluster analysis, x̄ ± SD of cluster size per cell, t test (ns). " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109375

Figure Lengend Snippet: Gain-of-function mutations in β TMR (A) CD3 surface expression of 1G4-WT and mutants. x̄ ± SD of CD3 + cells, n = 3–8. Ala (red) and Leu (blue) substitution. (B) pErk response of 1G4-WT and β mutants stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . x̄ ± SEM of pErk + cells; n = 3–6; unpaired t test, p = 0.0011 (βA290), p = 0.0092 (βA291). (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT and 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.82 (WT), 0.89 (βA291); EC 50 = 19.5 ± 5.5 (WT), 19.0 ± 3.1 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S1 E. (D) (6V-A2) 4 binding to 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top, (6V-A2) 4 dose-dependent association, n = 3, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.97 (βA291), F-test (ns). Bottom, (6V-A2) 4 dissociation rate, n = 5, non-linear regression fit, R 2 = 0.84 (WT), 0.72 (βA291), F-test (ns). (E) pζ response of J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 MFI versus pζ MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.95 (WT), 0.96 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pζ, n = 4, unpaired t test p = 0.0078. See also Figure S1 F. (F) Basal pζ in J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. pζ MFI normalized to surface CD3 MFI, n = 8, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also H and S1I. (G) FRAP of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. x̄ ± SD of diffusion coefficient, D (μm 2 /s), n ≥ 20 cells, t test (ns). (H) Lateral distribution by dSTORM of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291 treated (right) or not (left) with A770041. Plots represent pair auto-correlation analysis (g), x̄ ± SD of ≥ 25 cells. Histograms show DBSCAN cluster analysis, x̄ ± SD of cluster size per cell, t test (ns).

Article Snippet: Rat anti-human CD3ε mAb , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat# 4443, RRID: AB_560945.

Techniques: Expressing, Binding Assay, Diffusion-based Assay

βY291 contribution to TCR-CD3 quaternary structure cohesion (A) Anti-HA (β-HA) pull-down (PD), and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top panels: left, representative IB, arrows indicate β-isoforms; right, x̄ ± SD of ε/β T and ζ/β 2 , n = 5, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Bottom panels: input lysates, left, representative IB; right, x̄ ± SD of β T /actin, ε/actin and ζ/actin, n = 5, unpaired t test (ns). (B) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. NR (non-reducing) conditions. Left, representative IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of γ/β T , n = 4, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (C) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. NR conditions. Left, representative IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of δ/β T , n = 4, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (D) All-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. TCRα (ochre), TCRβ (gray), CD3δ (blue), CD3ε (yellow), CD3γ (green), ζ (red). Left, snapshot of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Right, βY291 interactions with TCR-CD3 TMRs. Liquorice sticks show significant contacts of βY291 with TCRα, CD3γ, and CD3ε. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S2 H. " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109375

Figure Lengend Snippet: βY291 contribution to TCR-CD3 quaternary structure cohesion (A) Anti-HA (β-HA) pull-down (PD), and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. Top panels: left, representative IB, arrows indicate β-isoforms; right, x̄ ± SD of ε/β T and ζ/β 2 , n = 5, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Bottom panels: input lysates, left, representative IB; right, x̄ ± SD of β T /actin, ε/actin and ζ/actin, n = 5, unpaired t test (ns). (B) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. NR (non-reducing) conditions. Left, representative IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of γ/β T , n = 4, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (C) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-βA291. NR conditions. Left, representative IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of δ/β T , n = 4, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (D) All-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. TCRα (ochre), TCRβ (gray), CD3δ (blue), CD3ε (yellow), CD3γ (green), ζ (red). Left, snapshot of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Right, βY291 interactions with TCR-CD3 TMRs. Liquorice sticks show significant contacts of βY291 with TCRα, CD3γ, and CD3ε. See also Figure S2 H.

Article Snippet: Rat anti-human CD3ε mAb , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat# 4443, RRID: AB_560945.

Techniques:

Loosening ζ association enhances signaling (A) TCR-CD3 expression of 1G4-WT, 1G4-βA291, 1G4-βL291, and 1G4-βF291 in CD8 − J76. Left, x̄ ± SEM of CD3 MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Right, x̄ ± SEM of β-HA MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, t test (ns). (B) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-β mutants. Left, representative IB, the arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Middle, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 3, unpaired t test WT versus βA291, WT versus βL291 p < 0.0001, WT versus βF291 p < 0.01. Right, x̄ ± SD of ε/β T , n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βF291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.915 (WT), 0.910 (βF291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.05. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S3 A (left). (D) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βL291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.827 (WT), 0.910 (βL291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S3 A (right). (E) TCR-CD3 expression in CD8 − J76 2H5-WT or 2H5-βA291. Left, x̄ ± SEM of CD3 MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Right, x̄ ± SEM of β-HA MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, t test (ns). (F) β-HA PD and IB of 2H5-WT or 2H5-βA291. Left, representative IB. Middle, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Right, x̄ ± SD of ε/β, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.01. (G) pErk response of CD8 − J76 2H5-WT or 2H5-βA291 stimulated with (MART-1-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (MART-1-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.94 (WT), 0.94 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.001. See also Figure S3 B. " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109375

Figure Lengend Snippet: Loosening ζ association enhances signaling (A) TCR-CD3 expression of 1G4-WT, 1G4-βA291, 1G4-βL291, and 1G4-βF291 in CD8 − J76. Left, x̄ ± SEM of CD3 MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Right, x̄ ± SEM of β-HA MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, t test (ns). (B) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT or 1G4-β mutants. Left, representative IB, the arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Middle, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 3, unpaired t test WT versus βA291, WT versus βL291 p < 0.0001, WT versus βF291 p < 0.01. Right, x̄ ± SD of ε/β T , n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (C) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βF291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.915 (WT), 0.910 (βF291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.05. See also Figure S3 A (left). (D) pErk response of CD8 − J76 1G4-WT or 1G4-βL291 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.827 (WT), 0.910 (βL291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S3 A (right). (E) TCR-CD3 expression in CD8 − J76 2H5-WT or 2H5-βA291. Left, x̄ ± SEM of CD3 MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Right, x̄ ± SEM of β-HA MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, t test (ns). (F) β-HA PD and IB of 2H5-WT or 2H5-βA291. Left, representative IB. Middle, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Right, x̄ ± SD of ε/β, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.01. (G) pErk response of CD8 − J76 2H5-WT or 2H5-βA291 stimulated with (MART-1-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (MART-1-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.94 (WT), 0.94 (βA291). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.001. See also Figure S3 B.

Article Snippet: Rat anti-human CD3ε mAb , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat# 4443, RRID: AB_560945.

Techniques: Expressing

Loosening ζ association enhances signaling (A) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Contacts between TCRβ (gray), ζ 1 (light red), and ζ 2 (dark red) TMRs. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S4 A. βY291 is represented as liquorice stick for reference and does not contact ζζ. (B) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Left, ζ 1 (light red) and ζ 2 (dark red) residues contacting TCRα TMR (in transparency). Right, TCRα (ochre) residues contacting ζ 1 and ζ 2 TMRs (in transparency). See also Figure S4 B. (C) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Left, contacts between ζ 2 (red) and CD3γ (green) TMRs. Right, top view of ζ 2 I41 (red) contacts with CD3γ (green). See also C and S4F. (D) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Left, contacts between ζ 1 (red) and CD3ε (δε) (yellow) TMRs. Right, top view of ζ 1 I38 (red) contacts with CD3ε (δε) (yellow). See also D and S4E. (E) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs carrying ζA38 (lines) aligned to ζWT (cartoon) at the end of 1,250 ns MDS. TCRα (ochre), TCRβ (gray), CD3δ (blue), CD3ε (yellow), CD3γ (green), ζ (red). See also G–S4J. (F) Normalized spatial distributions of the Cα atoms of ζζ relative to the Cα atoms of TCRαβ in ζWT and ζA38. (G) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs carrying ζA41 (lines) aligned to ζWT (cartoon) at the end of 1,250 ns MDS. TCRα (ochre), TCRβ (gray), CD3δ (blue), CD3ε (yellow), CD3γ (green), ζ (red). See also K–S4N. (H) Normalized spatial distributions of the Cα atoms of ζζ relative to the Cα atoms of TCRαβ in ζWT and ζA41. " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109375

Figure Lengend Snippet: Loosening ζ association enhances signaling (A) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Contacts between TCRβ (gray), ζ 1 (light red), and ζ 2 (dark red) TMRs. See also Figure S4 A. βY291 is represented as liquorice stick for reference and does not contact ζζ. (B) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Left, ζ 1 (light red) and ζ 2 (dark red) residues contacting TCRα TMR (in transparency). Right, TCRα (ochre) residues contacting ζ 1 and ζ 2 TMRs (in transparency). See also Figure S4 B. (C) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Left, contacts between ζ 2 (red) and CD3γ (green) TMRs. Right, top view of ζ 2 I41 (red) contacts with CD3γ (green). See also C and S4F. (D) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs. Left, contacts between ζ 1 (red) and CD3ε (δε) (yellow) TMRs. Right, top view of ζ 1 I38 (red) contacts with CD3ε (δε) (yellow). See also D and S4E. (E) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs carrying ζA38 (lines) aligned to ζWT (cartoon) at the end of 1,250 ns MDS. TCRα (ochre), TCRβ (gray), CD3δ (blue), CD3ε (yellow), CD3γ (green), ζ (red). See also G–S4J. (F) Normalized spatial distributions of the Cα atoms of ζζ relative to the Cα atoms of TCRαβ in ζWT and ζA38. (G) Snapshot from all-atom MDS of TCR-CD3 TMRs carrying ζA41 (lines) aligned to ζWT (cartoon) at the end of 1,250 ns MDS. TCRα (ochre), TCRβ (gray), CD3δ (blue), CD3ε (yellow), CD3γ (green), ζ (red). See also K–S4N. (H) Normalized spatial distributions of the Cα atoms of ζζ relative to the Cα atoms of TCRαβ in ζWT and ζA41.

Article Snippet: Rat anti-human CD3ε mAb , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat# 4443, RRID: AB_560945.

Techniques:

Loosening ζ association enhances signaling (A) TCR-CD3 expression in J76-1G4WT-ζKO expressing ζWT or ζA38 or ζA41. Left, x̄ ± SEM of CD3 MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Middle, representative IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of ζ/actin, n = 3, unpaired t test (ns). (B) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT carrying ζWT or ζA38 or ζA41. Left, representative IB, the arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Middle, x̄ ± SD of ε/β T , n = 4, unpaired t test (ns). Right, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 4, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also <xref ref-type=Figure S5 A. (C) pErk response of J76-1G4WT-ζKO expressing ζWT or ζA38 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.99 (ζA38). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S5 B. (D) pErk response of J76-1G4WT-ζKO expressing ζWT or ζA41 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.96 (WT), 0.97 (ζA41). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S5 C. " width="100%" height="100%">

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109375

Figure Lengend Snippet: Loosening ζ association enhances signaling (A) TCR-CD3 expression in J76-1G4WT-ζKO expressing ζWT or ζA38 or ζA41. Left, x̄ ± SEM of CD3 MFI in HA low gate, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. Middle, representative IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of ζ/actin, n = 3, unpaired t test (ns). (B) β-HA PD and IB of 1G4-WT carrying ζWT or ζA38 or ζA41. Left, representative IB, the arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Middle, x̄ ± SD of ε/β T , n = 4, unpaired t test (ns). Right, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 4, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S5 A. (C) pErk response of J76-1G4WT-ζKO expressing ζWT or ζA38 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.98 (WT), 0.99 (ζA38). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S5 B. (D) pErk response of J76-1G4WT-ζKO expressing ζWT or ζA41 stimulated with (6V-A2) 4 . Left, non-linear regression fit of (6V-A2) 4 nM versus pErk MFI, n = 3, R 2 = 0.96 (WT), 0.97 (ζA41). Right, x̄ ± SD of max. pErk, n = 3, F-test p < 0.0001. See also Figure S5 C.

Article Snippet: Rat anti-human CD3ε mAb , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat# 4443, RRID: AB_560945.

Techniques: Expressing

Monovalent pMHC in solution triggers TCR-CD3 untying and intracellular signaling (A) J76 wtc51 ± A770041 stimulated or not with sm-9V-A2 were lysed and subjected to PD with anti-HA Ab or Talon beads. First panel, anti-HA (β-HA) (lanes 1, 3, 5) or Talon beads (His) (lanes 2, 4, 6) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n ≥ 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n ≥ 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (B) CD8 − J76 wtc51 stimulated or not with sm-9V-A2 were processes as in (A). First panel, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.01. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.05. (C) J76 868 stimulated or not with sm-6I-A2 were processed as in (A). First panel, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.01. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (D) CD8 − J76 868 stimulated or not with sm-6I-A2. Left, representative pErk IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.05. (E) Primary T cells expressing wtc51 stimulated or not with sm-9V-A2 were processed as in (A). First panel, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SEM of ζ/β 2 , n = 2, unpaired t test p < 0.05. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SEM of pErk, n = 2, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (F) J76 wtc51 were lysed, incubated or not with sm-9V-A2, and subjected to PD by anti-HA or Talon beads. Left, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Right, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 5, unpaired t test p < 0.0001.

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109375

Figure Lengend Snippet: Monovalent pMHC in solution triggers TCR-CD3 untying and intracellular signaling (A) J76 wtc51 ± A770041 stimulated or not with sm-9V-A2 were lysed and subjected to PD with anti-HA Ab or Talon beads. First panel, anti-HA (β-HA) (lanes 1, 3, 5) or Talon beads (His) (lanes 2, 4, 6) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n ≥ 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001 and p < 0.01. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n ≥ 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (B) CD8 − J76 wtc51 stimulated or not with sm-9V-A2 were processes as in (A). First panel, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.01. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.05. (C) J76 868 stimulated or not with sm-6I-A2 were processed as in (A). First panel, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.01. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (D) CD8 − J76 868 stimulated or not with sm-6I-A2. Left, representative pErk IB. Right, x̄ ± SD of pErk, n = 3, unpaired t test p < 0.05. (E) Primary T cells expressing wtc51 stimulated or not with sm-9V-A2 were processed as in (A). First panel, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Second panel, x̄ ± SEM of ζ/β 2 , n = 2, unpaired t test p < 0.05. Third panel, representative pErk IB. Fourth panel, x̄ ± SEM of pErk, n = 2, unpaired t test p < 0.0001. (F) J76 wtc51 were lysed, incubated or not with sm-9V-A2, and subjected to PD by anti-HA or Talon beads. Left, β-HA (lanes 1, 3) or His (lanes 2, 4) PD and IB for β and ζ. The arrow indicates β 2 isoform. Right, x̄ ± SD of ζ/β 2 , n = 5, unpaired t test p < 0.0001.

Article Snippet: Rat anti-human CD3ε mAb , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat# 4443, RRID: AB_560945.

Techniques: Expressing, Incubation

Journal: Cell Reports

Article Title: Allosteric activation of T cell antigen receptor signaling by quaternary structure relaxation

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109375

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: Rat anti-human CD3ε mAb , Cell Signaling Technology , Cat# 4443, RRID: AB_560945.

Techniques: Virus, Recombinant, Protein Extraction, Cell Isolation, Saline, Suspension, Sterility, Expressing, Software

Three mm full thickness excisional wounds were made on dorsal skin of IL-4 Tg and WT mice. At various time points, frozen sections were prepared for neutrophil (Gr-1), macrophage (CD68), CD3, and DETC staining. Positively stained cells in the wounds and wound margins were counted and the average number per 20x field was calculated. a and b) Time course of the number of neutrophils and macrophages, respectively. c and d) YM1 and Arg1 mRNA expression in wounds respectively. e and f) Time course of the number of dermal CD3+ lymphocytes and DETC, respectively. * p<0.05, # p<0.01, and ** p<0.001compared to WT at the same time point, respectively. NS: normal or unwounded skin. The number of mice used at each time point was 5.

Journal: PLoS ONE

Article Title: Aberrant Wound Healing in an Epidermal Interleukin-4 Transgenic Mouse Model of Atopic Dermatitis

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146451

Figure Lengend Snippet: Three mm full thickness excisional wounds were made on dorsal skin of IL-4 Tg and WT mice. At various time points, frozen sections were prepared for neutrophil (Gr-1), macrophage (CD68), CD3, and DETC staining. Positively stained cells in the wounds and wound margins were counted and the average number per 20x field was calculated. a and b) Time course of the number of neutrophils and macrophages, respectively. c and d) YM1 and Arg1 mRNA expression in wounds respectively. e and f) Time course of the number of dermal CD3+ lymphocytes and DETC, respectively. * p<0.05, # p<0.01, and ** p<0.001compared to WT at the same time point, respectively. NS: normal or unwounded skin. The number of mice used at each time point was 5.

Article Snippet: Sections were then incubated with either rat anti-mouse Gr-1 (for neutrophil staining, 0.5μg/ml;BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA), rat anti-mouse CD68 (for macrophage staining, 0.5 μg/ml; Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rat anti-mouse CD3 (for T lymphocyte staining, 1.25 μg/ml; SouthernBiotech, Birminham, AL), rat anti-mouse CD31 (for endothelial cell staining, 0.3 μg/ml, BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), rabbit anti-mouse Ki67 (for proliferating cell staining, 0.5 μg/ml; Abcam), or hamster anti-mouse dendritic epidermal T cells (DETC) (1.25 μ/ml;, BD Biosciences) for 45 min followed by Alexa fluor 488 or 594 goat anti-rat IgG, or goat anti-rabbit IgG Alexa fluor 594, or goat anti-hamster IgG Alexa fluor 594 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).

Techniques: Staining, Expressing

Deficiency of sEH reduces the leukocyte infiltration and cytokine production. ((a) and (b)) 14 days after UUO surgery, kidneys were harvested. Kidney lysates from WT and sEH −/− mice were immunoblotted with F4/80, CD3, MPO, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and GAPDH. (c) The levels of MCP-1, MIP-2, IL-1 β , and IL-6 in kidneys were assessed by ELISA kits. Data are mean ± SEM from 8 mice. * P < 0.05 versus WT nonobstructed kidney; # P < 0.05 versus WT UUO kidney.

Journal: Mediators of Inflammation

Article Title: Genetic Deletion of Soluble Epoxide Hydrolase Attenuates Inflammation and Fibrosis in Experimental Obstructive Nephropathy

doi: 10.1155/2015/693260

Figure Lengend Snippet: Deficiency of sEH reduces the leukocyte infiltration and cytokine production. ((a) and (b)) 14 days after UUO surgery, kidneys were harvested. Kidney lysates from WT and sEH −/− mice were immunoblotted with F4/80, CD3, MPO, inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and GAPDH. (c) The levels of MCP-1, MIP-2, IL-1 β , and IL-6 in kidneys were assessed by ELISA kits. Data are mean ± SEM from 8 mice. * P < 0.05 versus WT nonobstructed kidney; # P < 0.05 versus WT UUO kidney.

Article Snippet: Rabbit anti-collagen (COL)4A2, anti-sEH, goat anti-COL1A1, mouse anti- α -actin, and rat anti-CD3 antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA).

Techniques: Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay